My 'beginner level, class E and lower' chess computers

Novag Chess Champion MK I

Year: 1978
Programmer: David Goodrich
CPU: F8 3850 @1.78Mhz
ROM: 2Kb
Elo level: 725
(935 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.45
Rperf: 45%

I really longed completing my collection with the famous Chess Champion MK I, but I choosed to wait for a nice opportunity: a mint condition device, with a very well preserved packaging, including the mains adapter and offered at a very low price (€16 on French eBay, I remained the only bidder). Because this chess computer is objectively not worth much! It is famous, surely not because of the chess skills, rather for the very primitive aspects of the device! First one in the Novag line of chess computers (also sold using the Videomaster brand in UK), using a clone copy of the CompuChess software born in 1977 (legal proceedings occured, without consequences as the CompuChess was not properly copyrighted), it does not even check the player's moves with regards to the chess rules... So, despite the manual stating the computer would rely on the player fairness, the fact is a simple input mistake can easily make the game void. So you really need to focus, in order to complete a whole game... Moreover, the user's manual puts much emphasis on the need to track each move on a paper game log, to be able to perform checks and so rectify potential mistakes. Another obvious restriction, it is announced that it only plays as black. As a matter of fact, it is possible to let it play as white, first of all switching queen & king positions in the computer's memory (thanksfully, an ep function standing for Enter Position is available), then playing a dummy first move leaving the whole position unchanged (leveraging the lack of rules control). The player can then simply place his black pieces in a usual position in front of himself, and use the algebraic notation without any rotation, meaning his pieces are on first and second row, while the A column stands on his left side. The computer considers his pieces to be black, but it does not matter... A bit tricky, but it works! Some parts of the user's manual are very funny to whoever is aware of the 'floor' level of play:
    - 'It may look as though the CC MK I reacts illogically' (indeed!)
    - 'in endgames that are very clearly to your disadvantage...' (can this happen?) '...you must be prepared to resign... otherwise the end-game will be very drawn-out...' a way to aknowledge the program is unable to force a checkmate in a number of situations!
The packaging is as well sort of a compilation of humour, mainly the quotations supposed to be Anatoly Karpov's comments (on my box; but I found a picture of another box ascribing the very same words to Boris Spassky):
    - '... an opponent ... playing surprising move variants'
    - 'Makes chess immediately enjoyable'
    - 'An incorruptible player, relentless with the slightest mistake of his opponent'
This chess computer is a real anthological master piece! 

     

Novag Chess Champion Delta-1

Year: 1980
Programmer: David Lindsay (pirated)
CPU: F8 3850 @2Mhz
ROM: 4Kb
Elo level: 925
(1085 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.5
Rperf: 57%

The Delta-1 is a slightly mysterious oddity within the first chess calculators from Novag. Designed in 1979, it has been released later on the market, end of year 1980, after the Chess Champion MK II and MK III ( = Super System III presented in next category), both released in 1979. Authorship is still to be confirmed, but I actually spotted 40% of Boris Diplomat's ROM code being present in the Delta-1. As a reference, 43% of Boris Diplomat's code is present in its brother Boris (shown hereafter), consanguinity levels are equivalent. According to Michael, Hiarcs forum member, the analysis of RAM state while playing (enabled running the emulated code with smartly located breakpoints) shows similarity with the Boris, especially the same board representation in memory. Besides, both Boris and the Delta-1 share a rare peculiarity: the last move played by the computer is not updated on the internal board, until the next player's move is entered. I think odds are high for a D. Lindsay program (either licensed or pirated !). Update: a fragment of Boris (v2 & Master) welcome message (BORIS AWAITS YOUR MOVE) has been spotted at offset 0878 of the Delta-1 ROM. This data is nowhere useful in this device (limited to displaying coordinates) and provides an evidence the program is a hacking of Boris' ROM. To my opinion, being scalded by the trial regarding the MK I (the decision by the court of appeal occured in September 1980), the firm held the release on the market for this device, too close to the MK I from a hardware standpoint (copyright protection was better regarding hardware than software in those times), and featuring a program whose origin was not announced (the reason why being now obvious). In the meantime, as for it, the Super System III might be released (designed using another CPU, 6502, and a known programmer, M. Johnson); but Novag needed to feed the lower range market. This has been done selling the MK II also using a 6502 (it is no use multiplying technologies) and whose programmer has been announced as well (P. Jennings, of Microchess program fame). At late 80, feeling reassured by the court decision in favor of itself, Novag gets back to using the Fairchild F8, less performing but cheaper than the 6502, fitting well its market target; and released its delayed Delta-1 among others (Chess Champion Pocket Chess and Chess Partner 2000).
Actually deserving the title of successor to the MK I, what is this Delta-1 worth? I got it as a birthday gift, it was offered on French eBay, €20 'buy now', with original mint condition package, and the necessary mains adapter, original Novag one as well. It is much more user-friendly than the MK I, the interface is still basic but has been hugely enhanced: play with white or black, castle and en-passant moves without tricky keys inputs, legal moves checked... The display continuously shows the current best move while the computer is thinking, but holding a key down reveals the remaining time down to moving. The level is set using a timer (as it is done with the Boris, so ...). Lacking any openings book and any endgame dedicated knowledge, the chess skills remain quite low. The Delta-1 loves pushing its pawns, even at the expense of developing other pieces! Hereafter, ROM sample showing the 1979 (c) ; a date one can also find on the packaging and the user's manual:



Mephisto Solar King

Year: 1996
Programmer: Craig Barnes
CPU: KS56C220 @4Mhz 
ROM: 2Ko
Elo level: 986 (1131 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.39
Rperf: 61%
Square size: 0.98"

A 'solar' chess computer, powered by photovoltaic cells? I was really curious to test that. With regards to other features, including a tiny 2K program from Craig Barnes running on a 4 bits micro-controller paced at 4Mhz, nothing much promising... But this Solar King was offered for €15 on french "le bon coin", in nice condition with original packaging; so, for science sake, I yielded to temptation. So, does playing using solar energy work? Well, technically yes. Outdoor and under the shade of an awning, you can play without batteries. First cold start required to press the reset button (ACL), that's all. On another hand, the playing skills revealed being... simply awful. The user manual states the 'Eco' levels (solar mode) require more time than the 'Turbo' ones (requiring a set of three 1.5V batteries); and I go into more detail (after using a stopwatch): they are slower by 30%; but above all, the manual warns about a weaker play. An euphemism... The manual even states, as an example, the program can overlook a mate in one while thinking in Eco mode, while such a fail would barely happen in Turbo mode, only with the few first levels. I can confirm: I experienced a mate in one not found in Eco-H8 level (the maximum one, using 2 minutes and 15 seconds search time), while in Turbo mode, the mate is found as soon as using the A2 level (5.5 seconds). My preferred pace (and reference one) for playing my chess computers being 15 seconds per move, in solar mode the program is nowhere near to give checkmate, except a lucky move. It is vulnerable to mates in one it should be able to avoid, it takes opponent's pieces without basically checking for immediate counterstrike - such as sacrifying rook or queen for a defended pawn. Aren't you fully convinced of the playing skills? I had it play two games in solar mode against my weakest chess computer, the Novag MK I... The Solar King has been dominated, losing piece after piece, to end checkmated by the MK I, whichever black or white it played! A weaker opponent than the MK I, this will be hard to find out... Oh yes, Alpha Chess 4,the weakest PC program I have, my estimation being around 560 Elo points... OK, this time the Solar King dominates both games, getting in a huge material advantage, as far as two queens, one rook, one bishop prowling around the isolated opponent's king... and it gives stalemate in both games. I evaluate its strength in solar mode around 600 Elo points. At least, Saitek's marketing department didn't cheat while announcing 128 levels: 64 Eco levels plus 64 Turbo levels, as they do not overlap (Turbo mode A1 seems to be slightly stronger than Eco mode H8). The 'Turbo' attribute is as well deserved... as difference in speed is glaringly obvious. Using Eco mode, the chessboard is significantly slow to response any command, either pressure on control keys or pressure on squares, letting it be disagreeable to use. In Turbo mode, all is fine, despite the squares lacking a bit of sensitiveness under finger pressure, everything is immediately responsive, and confirmed by a faint beep which the Eco mode disables to save energy. To illustrate it, I compared the response time when I checkmate the program (yes indeed, I can!): Eco mode, 12.5 seconds to assess the game is over. Turbo mode, uneasy to measure manually with my 1/10 stopwatch, my results focused around 4 tenth of a second. And considering the program spends 12.5 seconds just to ascertain it is checkmated, you may guess it is nowhere close to checkmate you, while playing at 15 seconds per move in solar mode... What can I say, in addition to that, regarding the solar mode? Oh yes, the energy saving... Luckily, the service manual of the Solar Star (same device, but mobile form factor) is available here. Typical current consumption is 1.2 milliamperes in Turbo mode, while it is 90 microamperes in Eco mode, thus a 13.33 ratio. Despite the photovoltaic cells being up to the job in Eco mode, inserting batteries is recommended, to compensate any potential drop in available light, this could waste an ongoing game (the computer powering down without saved memory, for lack of energy). In Turbo mode, the cells (assuming they receive enough light) slightly reduce battery use (they are expected to provide above 3.3V under 600 lux). The service manual provides another much valuable information: the troubleshooting chart states the technician should check the 4MHz clock only in Turbo mode. On the other hand, the secondary oscillator, paced at 96kHz, must be checked whatever the mode. So, the previously observed slowdown may be deduced: in Eco mode, the active clocking signal is 41.66 times slower than in Turbo mode. This confirms the delay to assess checkmate: 12.5s in Eco mode divided by this ratio results in exactly 0.3 seconds in Turbo mode, which value lays within the accuracy range of my own measure. A pleasant fact to point out, levels are scaled in a perfect linear manner, whichever mode Eco or Turbo, each step forward adding around two seconds to the previous thinking time. No position setup is available, but you may take back your last played move. Lastly, be aware the program has no openings book, so computes as soon as its very first move. What is my final conclusion about the photovoltaic cells powering? It will come in very useful if you are Robinson on your despair island, without any opportunity to find batteries, and assuming you would teach chess to a kiddy Friday, who despite being a beginner will be happy to humiliate the computer. Except this situation, the lack of reactivity from the chessboard in solar mode, and the loss of 400 Elo points as an order of magnitude, aren't much bearable: batteries and Turbo mode are indispensable. Only remaining to its credit, the demonstrative aspect of the working with no batteries (but the wow! effect will not last), and the ecological participation of light energy to extend batteries life.

TEC Schachcomputer

Year: 1981
Programmer: Peter Jennings
CPU: 6504 @1Mhz
ROM: 5Kb
Elo level: 1019 (1156 FIDE)
CMhz: 1
Rperf: 60%
Square size: 0.82"

Peter Jennings has been a pioneer of chess programming for micro-computers, with his famous MicroChess program, developped as early as 1976; it will encounter a large commercial success. It was initially made available for the Kim-1 (6502@1Mhz) as a listing in hexadecimal machine code, to be manually punched by the user, and later on provided on audio tape; the program offered three playing levels (3, 10 or 100 seconds average per move); the faster levels just disabling part of the code. It then did not manage castling, "en passant" capture, nor pawn promotion; in order to fit the available memory (circa 1.1Kb)! On another hand, the manual did provide details about the program logic, presenting it as a basis, the hobbyist could extend; should he own a computer with more available RAM than the KIM-1 had. These restrictions were to be removed with the 1.5 version for the TRS-80 (still limited to only three playing levels) then the 2.0 version for the PET Commodore and the Apple II (with eight playing levels). This latest 2.0 version will as well be integrated in the following chess computers: Commodore Chessmate (1978), Novag Chess Champion MK II (1979), and TEC Schachcomputer (1981). I played a lot with MicroChess 1.5 on my TRS-80, I fairly couldn't not add it to my collection. Well, which one should I choose, then? The Commodore Chessmate is definitely too ugly; I already own many Novag devices; the TEC was my obvious best choice. I much like its look, reminiscent of the PET Commodore.  By the way, powered by a 6502@1Mhz, once running the MicroChess 2.0 program, the PET offered actually the same game as the TEC did, except for the graphical display of course (I checked the identical moves with a PET emulator!). The three clones (Chessmate, MK II and TEC) have a tiny openings book available, and play electronic tones with each hit key or displayed character. Fortunately, the sound level of the TEC is not too high, as these sounds cannot be disabled with any of the three clones. In addition to the appreciated PET-like design, the TEC Schachcomputer has the advantage of providing a small integrated chessboard (the squares are roughly 0.8 inches large; a passive board of course, as the moves need to be input using from-square and to-square coordinates) and it includes its own power adapter, letting it run directly from the mains. The keys are pleasant to press, with a very clear catch, and the large LEDs display layout provides perfect legibility: some far more recent chess computers will achieve definitely worse. The playing strength is the one of MicroChess: really weak, it is mostly a sparring partner one uses to train himself how to win at chess... Nevertheless, this program is a must have! I got it as a Christmas gift, it was offered on German eBay for €35. 



Applied Concept Boris Diplomat

Year: 1979
Programmer: David Lindsay
CPU: F8 3850 @1Mhz
ROM: 2.5Kb
Elo level: 1035
(1167 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.25
Rperf: 66%
Square size: 0.39"

When I received the shipped Boris Diplomat, bought for €30 (complete, but without the original user's manual and packaging), I doubted the parcel would contain anything. With no inserted batteries, it is definitely light weighted! It has been the very first travel electronic chessboard (not a pocket computer, though). It can run a few hours on batteries (but a connector for a mains adapter is as well available), and it features a small chessboard (a passive one, the player inputs his  moves using the keyboard). The tiny chessmen hold their position with pegs; aside the chessboard two rows offer additional slots to keep the sixteen first captured pieces. Beyond this number, one can temporarily keep the next ones using the clear casing, turned upside down. The bezel-shapped display is smartly designed, easily readable and relatively well protected. The red LED character set is indeed small, but really luminous, and so legible enough. As its elder brother Boris, the Diplomat can display a full rank of the chessboard squares, but using a simplified character set, less easily identified. Fortunately, the keys labelled 1 to 6 (potentially used to edit the chessboard position) are as well tagged with the pieces symbols, and act as an aide-memoire. This less advanced display also led to remove the sarcastic comments the Boris used to write; however the level setting keeps on using a timer, and the playing style and playing level of both devices are much similar. As with the Boris, one can miss the absence of any book of openings, resulting in a slow game as soon as the very beginning, a lack of variation unless changing the thinking time (despite some randomness applied to moves achieving equal scores), and a game often developped outside best practice. The real asset the Diplomat provides, with regards to the Boris, is the easy way you can get it ready for a quick game!

 

Applied Concept Boris

Year: 1978
Programmer: David Lindsay
CPU: F8 3850 @1Mhz
ROM: 2.5Kb
Elo level: 1045
(1175 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.25
Rperf: 67%
Square size: 1"
 
A historical milestone! I could not fail to get the immodest challenger of the first Chess Challengers (Boris is King!). It is so vintage with its unusual form factor featuring a walnut box, and its red LEDs display, reminding the ones used by programmable Texas Instruments calculators at this time (TI-57, 58, 59). It is able to display the chessboard row after row, making the position verification process, and update as well, outstandingly comfortable at that time, a lot more than the tedious square by square process featured in a CC7. Symbolic display of pieces is an asset as well, compared to numeral coding used by Chess Challengers at the same time. Playing level is set with a timer, to the nearest second, which guarantees a complete use of granted thinking time, with no overstep. On the other hand, thinking is stopped with no regards to the analysis completion. The Fairchild F8 powering it is definitely not a fast CPU, and playing level is quite low. Boris enlives its games with occasional text speech, more or less funny, streaming across the display during its thinking time. The messages seem to be chosen randomly, they are not consistent with the game position. I got this computer as a Christmas gift, it was offered for €100 on French website 'le bon coin'.

 

Saitek Calculator Chess

Year: 1992
Programmer: Craig Barnes
CPU: S3C7 @4Mhz (?)
ROM: 2Kb
Elo level: 1088
(1208 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.39
Rperf : 68%
Square size: 0.33"

An atypic device in my collection, I usually avoid chess computers requiring batteries. But its tiny chessboard is so charming, and I got it for €15! I wanted a Craig Barnes authored device, he most often seconded Julio Kaplan as a programmer. The 2K program is definitely limited, especially regarding its unusual setting for playing levels, using letter and numeral. The letter sets the primary search depth, the numeral has an effect on the endgame search depth, when less material speeds up the search. Proceeding by trial and error I assessed the 'B' levels to be too slow and too variable to fit my 15 s/move standard, even using 'B1'. As a consequence I use the 'A8' level which plays rather fast while using more time during the endgame. A matter of balance... The microcontroller model is not announced, I guess it to be probably close to, or similar to a 4bits Samsung S3C7 fitting well a pocket calculator, providing advanced features to manage the LCD display. Craig Barnes authored some other chess computers equipped with this microcontroller series (Mephisto Solar King and Solar Star) showing similar specifications (RAM, ROM, clock frequency); and Mephisto produced as well the Calculator Chess renamed Schachcomputer 64. Thus a S3C7 series microcontroller or similar is plausible, and is consistent with the playing strength. The gadget-like mini-chessboard can be completely pulled out, making available a small drawer at its back, useful to store the pieces captured during the game, to avoid losing some (a high risk!):  



Novag Chess Champion Chess Partner 2000

Year: 1980
Programmer: Mike Johnson
CPUF8 3850 @2.8Mhz
ROM: 4Kb
Elo level: 1092 (1211 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.7
Rperf: 66%
Square size: 0.98"

This electronic chessboard deserves attention as it is the first Novag/Scisys (both brands sold it, just after being splitted apart) to offer an integrated sensor board (push sensitive squares). Nevertheless, it does not break itself of the calculator form factor used with previous models, persisting in handling input-output with algebraic coordinates. So, no LEDs to display its moves; the player continues reading the code to be able to execute the computer's moves; and pushing the corresponding squares only provides an error control. Conversely, pushing the squares to enter a player's move only inputs the coordinates, then, once satisfied with the display, the player still needs to push 'Enter' to commit his move. The squares are, so, mostly experienced as a keyboard extension, compared to a Sensory 8 for example (launched same year on the market, just a few months before). At that time, a computer was still far from being common, and you could be proud of using a protocol having all the characteristic features of computers. At the same time, adding '2000' to goods or companies names was higly in vogue, and provided a taste of ultra-modern prospects. The CP2000 is much typical from this period and, so, desirable despite its flaws: the sensor board not sensitive enough (in addition to the rather clumsy protocol), the unsuccessful design (massive shaping, board crossbars, color), and the playing weakness. The 4K program is nevertheless slightly stronger than the 2K one used in the travel device from the same author (Pocket Chess / Chess Traveller, launched same year), benefitting from a few stored opening moves and a few code enhancements for the endgame. The weak computing power of the F8 (despite being hotted-up to 2.8Mhz) however limits the result. This device is not rare, it is easily found at moderate price, but often the blank keys show ugly yellow spots - so I awaited a nicely preserved one to enter it into my collection - I bought it €32 on German eBay (without original packaging). The Novag brand is labelled on the mains adaptor, while Scisys is printed on user's manual last page.

Scisys Chess Intercontinental Traveler

Year: 1982
Programmer: Mike Johnson
CPU: F8 3870 @3Mhz
ROM: 2Kb
Elo level: 1120
(1232 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.75
Rperf: 67%
Square size: 0.47"

This tiny 2Kb program from Mike Johnson has been widely sold starting from 1980, labelled as SciSys Chess Traveler (as well branded Acetronic Chess Traveller or Prinztronic Chess Traveller in the UK), Novag Chess Champion Pocket Chess, and Tandy Computerized Chess Game. Its cheap cost and travel form factor were tempting assets for a starter in computer chess world. I thus wished to add one to my collection, in order to represent this line of products! But as a matter of taste, I didn't like much the design of the computer, too colorful and disadvantaged by the protuberance of the big red LEDs display. I so waited for an opportunity to buy this more recent version, featuring a more discreet LCD display, which is more smoothly integrated in the design; a significantly higher clock speed, and a slightly enhanced software. On another hand, this Intercontinental Traveler revealed more difficult to find out, ads I spotted were all from the UK, where I finally bought it (including original packaging, mint condition) for €6.37 on eBay (I ended as the only bidder). Unlike the undermentioned Fidelity Mini Sensory, the holes in the chessboard only provide holding of the pluggable chessmen; moves are entered using the basic algebraic coordinates system. The software has no openings book, but nevertheless proceeds with quite correct development. Once middle game is reached, it lacks inspiration and is tactically weak, showing quite poor reactions facing threats - these drawbacks of course getting worse during endgame. One cannot expect wonders from a 2K program!

Fidelity Mini Sensory Chess Challenger + CAC

Year: 1981
Programmer: Ron Nelson
CPU: 8049 @6Mhz
ROM: 2+4Kb
Elo level: 1133
(1241 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.46
Rperf: 70%
Square size: 0.48"

This small travel chessboard entered my collection for three reasons: its form factor different from others in the Fidelity family, its processor distinctive from Z80 based chess computers designed by Ron Nelson, and last but not least a very attractive price, €35 on French "le bon coin". And for this price, a CAC module was included (Challenger Advanced Chess) and... a Sensory 8 as well (see next category). All this stuff including original packages, user manuals and the Sensory 8 mains adaptor, which can also be used to power the Mini Sensory. Featuring only 2Kb ROM providing four playing levels, the basic Mini Sensory upgrades to the six levels of a Chess Challenger Sensory 6 thanks to the CAC module. This 4K module also provides a small openings book (same as the Sensory 6's one), the ability to take two half moves back or to display a hint move, and pondering on opponent's think time. As far as I know it is the first device sold by Fidelity to be able to. It is not a permanent brain feature, as the program does not dig further than the level that has been previously set; but it occasionnally speeds the pace pleasantly up. Once the CAC module inserted, this program is clearly very close to the Sensory 6's one, thus... weak.



VEB Schachcomputer SC 2

Year: 1981
ProgrammerRon Nelson
CPU: U880 @2.46Mhz
ROM: 9Kb
Elo level: 1141
(1247 FIDE)
CMhz: 0.83
Rperf: 68%
Square size: 0.87"

Erich Honecker's chess computer! He owned one, now kept in Chemnitz games museum. It is a rustic copy of Fidelity Electronic's Chess Challenger 10C, featuring a slightly fitted version of Ron Nelson's program, running on a processor which is itself an East-German copy of Z80. The massive design made prominent by the thick bakelite casing, and the in-box mains power adaptor, result in a 2.2kg device weight. The keyboard is large as well, but provides an excellent feeling, the best ever amongst all my chess computers (keys trigger reed switches). A singularity to point out, the 'Check' (Schach) and 'Mate' (Matt) LEDs: Check lit notifies the SC 2 is threatening your king, while Mate announces the loss of the SC 2 ('I Lose' with the CC10). To announce its matting victory, the SC 2 display blinks. Another peculiarity, assuming you use some time before entering your move, the SC 2 calls you to order with a beep (same behavior as the one of the CC Voice, who periodically announces 'enter your move' or 'your move'). According to Rüdiger Worbs, co-author of next RFT chess computers (Chess-Master and Chess-Master Diamond), the SC 2 costed 3 months of an usual GDR wage and roughly 1000 units were built. I bought mine €25 on French 'le bon coin' website, in working order, without original box nor manual.

Fidelity Chess Challenger 10

Year: 1978
Programmer: Ron Nelson
CPU: Z80 @4Mhz
ROM: 4Kb
Elo level: 1167
(1267 FIDE)
CMhz: 1.35
Rperf: 68%
Square size: 0.87"

It is truly pure nostalgia that made me decide, quite late (after 10 years collecting!), to purchase a Chess Challenger 10 (10 stands for ten levels of play). Sure, I did not lack variants of Ron Nelson's program, already present in my collection with the Chess Challengers 6, 7, 8, Mini Sensory, and not to forget the East German SC2 copy. But it is the chess computer that initially did "inoculate" me, more than 40 years ago, with this passion. So, I finally got aware I missed it... Its appearance is much more luxurious than the one of all the other Chess Challengers, featuring a brushed-metal looking board set with solid walnut, with its nice little boxwood chessmen that look close to the Champion Sensory ones (displayed within next category; the chess pieces were most probably provided by Chavet, at least in France where the Chess Challengers were distributed by Rexton). It is a very nice article, providing a great pleasure to play with! However, the skills level is weak; I translate a report from the French Europe-Echecs magazine, October 1979 edition (you might want to read more on Blitzchess' amazing website): 'The other points that I had mentioned concerning CC 10 and the others seem to be confirmed by the tests of all the users: tendency to rush on the material, lack of sense of danger, irregular performance, extreme weakness in the endgame...'. Nevertheless, let's point out it is the first chess computer to reach the market with a (small) openings book. The first sold devices got immediate complains from their users, as the program nearly never castled, but Fidelity Electronics did remediate this weakness in a very short delay; it is the usual practice to name those fixed computers "B" version, while the very first are named "A" version. Mine is a "10B", thus apt to castling, and that is fine! (it is revealed after few played games, and can be confirmed using a test, thanks to a slight difference within the openings book - as no visible information is available on the computer itself). I bought it complete, in its original plastic attaché case, with the exception of the user manual (a printed copy of a scanned PDF); the price was €95 on eBay (Mondial Relay €4.99 shipment included, so the purchase price for the computer was €90.01). Of course it is a bit expensive, but cheap ones (you may find some ranging around €30 to 50) all displayed redhibitory defects to my opinion (non working, missing pawns, poor cosmetic aspect,...). Well, I was keen on not being disppointed!


Will you play with me? ...this is what this likeable Knight seems to tell you.

Conic Computer Chess

Year: 1981
Programmer: Stephen Chen
CPU: 6504 @1Mhz
ROM: 4Kb
Elo level: 1179
(1276 FIDE)
CMhz: 1
Rperf: 70%
Square size: 1.2"

I purchased this chess computer (€90, complete with its mains adapter, user manual and original packaging) mainly with regards to its eccentric playing system, based on pieces that can be plugged in, and one diod per square. While plug-in pieces are common for small travel chess computers, the Conic definitely does not belong to this category: featuring more than 14" long, more than 11" wide, and close to 2.2" thick, and only mains to power it, indeed this is a tabletop computer, and rather an imposing one. The male metal jacks under the chessmen are not so for stability, rather for detection thanks to electrical connection in the sockets featured in the center of each square. It is so a rather crude alternative ("tracer board") to systems named "sensory board" offered by some other brands, such as Fidelity Electronics. The operation is not so convincing, due to several reasons: handling is rather unnatural and slow (you need to use a bit of  strength to pull the pieces out, then you need to accurately aim the target socket); the software sometimes misreads the signals (legal move not acknowledged so, triggering the flickering of the relative LEDs, requiring to move back the piece to its initial position before successfully entering the same move again); requirement to confirm your move by pressing the "Enter" key (this reminds the Novag/Scisys Chess Partner 2000 operation mode). The move signals misreading can happen if the player is plugging in or pulling out the chessmen too slowly, and is unlikely to happen using straightforward and fast handling. On another hand, this system looks to be very sturdy and long-lasting, alike the whole device! Plastic is nice, which is no surprise knowing that Conic has been fonded thru diversification of an initial business of plastic casings molding for electronic devices. Only three chess computers were produced by this company, over a short period of time (in addition to the present Computer Chess: the 1979 Master I, and the 1982 Korchnoi). Without sure evidences, the author of these three programs appears to be Stephen Chen, named as so with the experimental version "Conic X" participation to the 1981 WMCCC (World Microcomputer Chess Championship). The Conic Korchnoi is supposed to be a close derivative to this Conic X. The assumed author is as well listed in Bill Hall's page dedicated to chess programming pionneers. Worth pointing out: the Conic Computer Chess (model 7012) introduced here was also distributed under the other brands and  names Conic Tracer 7012, Conic Electronic Chess 7012,  Conic Sensory H-20, Hanimex Computer Chess HGM 1200 (Germany), and Westrak Computer Chess CC1 (UK).


Picture showing the side drawers and the 0.6" metal jacks under the chessmen.



next category: 'occasionnal player, class D level' chess computers
back to 'my chess computers'